<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wax Scrawls: The Future of Criticism and LOLcats goes Avant-Garde</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/07/16/wax-scrawls-the-future-of-criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/07/16/wax-scrawls-the-future-of-criticism/</link>
	<description>WHERE MODERN THINGS MELT INTO OTHER MODERN THINGS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nav</title>
		<link>http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/07/16/wax-scrawls-the-future-of-criticism/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scrawledinwax.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I hear ya&#039;. I just thought the two articles showing up so close together was interesting. And this may be a simplistic distinction, but isn&#039;t an opinion a subjective reaction to a work, whereas criticism is situating, contextualising, positioning etc in relation to other art and its contexts? Obviously, at some point, the distinction will collapse, but that&#039;s always true on some level.

I think the thing that bugged my about Meis&#039; piece was the insistence on a work&#039;s internal logic - that&#039;s always struck me as a sneaky way to reintroduce authorial intent as the gold standard. 

Anyway, as always, appreciate the comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I hear ya&#8217;. I just thought the two articles showing up so close together was interesting. And this may be a simplistic distinction, but isn&#8217;t an opinion a subjective reaction to a work, whereas criticism is situating, contextualising, positioning etc in relation to other art and its contexts? Obviously, at some point, the distinction will collapse, but that&#8217;s always true on some level.</p>
<p>I think the thing that bugged my about Meis&#8217; piece was the insistence on a work&#8217;s internal logic &#8211; that&#8217;s always struck me as a sneaky way to reintroduce authorial intent as the gold standard. </p>
<p>Anyway, as always, appreciate the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margo</title>
		<link>http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/07/16/wax-scrawls-the-future-of-criticism/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scrawledinwax.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-1076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. I really hate both of those articles on criticism. I&#039;m far from a Kantian, but surely we can still make some distinction between having an opinion and the art of criticism (yes, I&#039;m with Wilde on this)? Or has our current master narrative got the TM on &quot;experts?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I really hate both of those articles on criticism. I&#8217;m far from a Kantian, but surely we can still make some distinction between having an opinion and the art of criticism (yes, I&#8217;m with Wilde on this)? Or has our current master narrative got the TM on &#8220;experts?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nav</title>
		<link>http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/07/16/wax-scrawls-the-future-of-criticism/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scrawledinwax.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heh. I didn&#039;t think you still stopped by :) Hope you&#039;re well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. I didn&#8217;t think you still stopped by <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Hope you&#8217;re well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/07/16/wax-scrawls-the-future-of-criticism/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scrawledinwax.wordpress.com/?p=367#comment-1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re welcome!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

