<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook and the Future of Capitalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/01/18/facebook-and-the-future-of-capitalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/01/18/facebook-and-the-future-of-capitalism/</link>
	<description>WHERE MODERN THINGS MELT INTO OTHER MODERN THINGS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scrawledinwax</title>
		<link>http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/01/18/facebook-and-the-future-of-capitalism/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scrawledinwax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/01/18/facebook-and-the-future-of-capitalism/#comment-701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment MM :) I think the &#039;it&#039;s hard to quit&#039; feeling is actually very valid and I feel the same way - it reinforces the idea that there are real, material consequences for not participating in the &#039;new economic revolution&#039;. In a practical sense, you get left out of the things your friends and peers are doing. I think that&#039;s why something like Facebook is so compelling - and so insidious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment MM <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I think the &#8216;it&#8217;s hard to quit&#8217; feeling is actually very valid and I feel the same way &#8211; it reinforces the idea that there are real, material consequences for not participating in the &#8216;new economic revolution&#8217;. In a practical sense, you get left out of the things your friends and peers are doing. I think that&#8217;s why something like Facebook is so compelling &#8211; and so insidious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metro mama</title>
		<link>http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/01/18/facebook-and-the-future-of-capitalism/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[metro mama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scrawledinwax.com/2008/01/18/facebook-and-the-future-of-capitalism/#comment-700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really interesting. Still have to read Hodgkinson&#039;s piece, but I&#039;ll get back to you (or we can talk fer reals at the next pub).

There&#039;s also been a lot of controversy in the blogosphere about the commercialization of personal blogs--marketers targeting bloggers who are insidiously advertising their products. 

My problem is, I don&#039;t know if I could quit Facebook!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really interesting. Still have to read Hodgkinson&#8217;s piece, but I&#8217;ll get back to you (or we can talk fer reals at the next pub).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also been a lot of controversy in the blogosphere about the commercialization of personal blogs&#8211;marketers targeting bloggers who are insidiously advertising their products. </p>
<p>My problem is, I don&#8217;t know if I could quit Facebook!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

