Archive for September, 2007

Is Singing in an English Accent an Act of Rebellion?

katenash3001.jpgAs seems to happen every few years, English pop divas were recently in the the news a lot. With Amy Winehouse’s drunken antics and Lily Allen’s refreshingly loose lips, you couldn’t get away from these ‘cockney’ singers if you tried. But Kate Nash, the most recent addition to this newest English invasion, has been in the news for slightly different reasons, namely that she rocketed to fame after Lily Allen mentioned Nash on her Myspace page and also a that she only picked up a guitar 2 years ago and is already at the top of the British charts.

I’m still deciding if Nash is brilliant (like she is on the track Foundations) or simply a harbinger of the apocalypse (as when she deadpans the line “Birds can fly so high / And they can shit on your head yeah” on Birds). But to me, most striking about Made of Bricks is Nash’s dogged refusal to sing in American accent. And while that might sound a bit strange, think about it: when singers from all over the world sing in English, they largely do so in an American accent. From the Cardigan’s Nina Persson to Bono to the bloody Beatles (who I blame for this), the American accent has become the accepted norm for musical expression in English.

Perhaps the most stark example of this trend is Amy Winehouse. While she speaks in a thick North London accent – so much so that she is often incomprehensible to North Americans – she sings as if she were from Detroit. But my point is not that “people should just be themselves”. If it were that straightforward, people would be. Instead, what we are looking at is normativity at work – the situating of something as ‘normal’ to the exclusion of a slew of other norms. While the term has a different meaning in philosophy, it is used in cultural studies to examine how, for example, heterosexuality, the masculine or ‘Whiteness’ are all uncritically positioned as norms. But to my mind, the clearest example of normativity right now is the American use of the ‘.com’ website suffix. Websites in general are known as ‘dot coms’, while country specific sites have extensions like .co.uk or our own .ca . Yet type in the -.com address for any major company around the world – Sony, Honda, T-Mobile – and you will end up at the American website. To get to the other national websites, you need the .ca or .co.uk or whatever extention. To wit, the normal ending for a website is ‘.com’ – and normal in the real world is American.

So, what does any of this have to do with Kate Nash? Well, while Nash is by no means the first to sing in an English accent (everyone from traditional folk musicians to Massive Attack to the Arctic Monkeys have done so) the mass acceptance and appeal of pop stars Kate Nash and Lily Allen may signify something new. Nash is unapologetically English and peppers her songs with markers and idioms familiar to an English audience. By doing so, she has rejected the ‘normalcy’ of America and challenged the unspoken rule that says that if you want to be successful you will sing as if you were an American. But unlike an obscure indie act, Nash’s success may indicate a desire to reject the homogenisation of the globe, the seemingly inevitable march towards the entire English-speaking world becoming American.

That’s not to say, of course, that the values in a Kate Nash song are terribly different than in one by Rhianna or Hillary Duff – I mean, let’s not get carried away. But perhaps the success of Nash and Allen are indicators that the internet, rather than homogenising the world, will cement certain aesthetic differences, as surfers now aware of the overwhelming diversity that is out there, seek comfort in the familiar and the known. While keeping up with the latest trends in West-Coast hip-hop is possible from a flat in Hounslow or Etobicoke, it’s a heck of a lot easier and more relevant to simply listen to music that reflects not only your dialect but also the markers of the world you live in.

So in response to my question – “Is Singing in an English Accent an Act of Rebellion?” – probably not. But is a bunch of popstars singing in their native accents significant? It just might well be. Hit the comments to let me know what you think.

Note: The preceding post had absolutely nothing to do with a minor, inappropriate crush on Kate Nash. No really. Nothing at all.

, , , , ,

12 Comments

Trapped in the Closet: Welcome to the Post-Postmodern?

Trapped in the ClosetDoes R. Kelly’s Opus Herald the End of Postmodernism and the Death of Irony?

In Planet Simpson, Chris Turner’s smart, fawning dedication to The Simpsons, he rather grandly suggests that, despite two or three decades of ironic detachment, “the future belongs to the sincere”. The self-reflexive irony so characterised by The Simpsons, Taylor argues, is merely a cultural transition period, a stopgap solution to the postmodern re-understanding of the world. Postmodernism and its pastiche and irony – these are merely placeholders while we figure out what the hell to do when meaning and morality are constantly in flux.

The postmodern destabilisation of old hierarchies and axioms has had broad-ranging, diverse effects, some positive (e.g. feminism, civil rights etc.), some less so (e.g. The Simple Life). Indeed, there is not enough time or space on this or any blog to document the swath that postmodernism has cut through culture. But the effect of the postmodern on art specifically might be summed up by saying that it challenged how artists approached representation i.e. what it is that art purports to actually show. While for centuries it was verisimilitude that was key – that art should approximate real life as much as possible, whether in painting, drama or film – postmodernism suggested that the only option left was to lay bare the art-ifice of art, to focus all the attention on the prefix “re-” at the beginning of ‘re-presentation’. To wit, the audience have to be in a double space, aware that that a picture of a pipe is not a pipe while they simultaneously enjoy how realistic the picture seems.

In the later half of the twentieth century, artists worked to reveal artifice much more directly through the aggressive use of irony, a wink at the viewer that detached him or her from the presented ‘reality’. Ironic representation might be exemplified by Charlie Kaufman’s films, particularly Adaptation, as its focus on the writer forces the viewer into the the ‘double view’ that irony demands – the film moves its plot forward by forcing the viewer to engage the constructedness and cliché of the plot while enjoying the very same patterns. This wryness, this wink and nod to the viewer is the contemporary standard – everything from music videos to film to blogs revel in this knowingness, this subtle admission that this all really just a game of sorts in which the rulebook has been thrown out of the window. Far from being an occasional technique, irony is the current model for representation and, according to many, is the only sensible approach to a world rightly wary of sincerity.

Now, if you have been dedicated enough to read this far – you might well be asking: what the hell does this have to do with R. Kelly? Well, I’m about to suggest that if ironic detachment has been our culture’s artistic M.O. for some time now, then Kelly’s recent opus Trapped in the Closet might signal some sort of shift – that the age of irony is ending and is being replaced by an even drier, more layered and inscrutable one. Read the rest of this entry »

2 Comments

Welcome to Scrawled in Wax – Again!

Welcome to the new home of Scrawled in Wax, the blog that takes tech, the web, pop culture and gaming, melts them all together and examines the waxy waxy mess…

I sincerely hope that the new blog is both easier on the eyes and more cohesive and entertaining to read. While there will still be lots of nerdy, tech-y stuff to read, I hope to branch out a bit into more pop-culture and politics.

Any feedback on the blog’s design or content is always welcome. Feel free to get in touch at navalang (at) gmail (dot) com. And as always, hit the comments button and add your own thoughts – or tell me I’m an idiot. I may not always reply right away, but you can be certain that I read (and appreciate) them.

I’ll ‘officially re-launch’ with a long piece on why R. Kelly’s “Trapped in the Closet” heralds the arrival of the post-ironic. Yeah, you read that right.

-Nav

[Update: Feedburner is giving me all kinds of problems, so I'd suggest holding off on adding the RSS feed, as it will likely change later].

2 Comments

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.